Spectrum: the Journal of State Government,
Wntr 1998 v71 nl p26(2)
Education as crime prevention.
Abstract: A study conducted by the Center on Crime,
Communities and Culture revealed that the rates of recidivism are
inversely proportional to the level of education attained by the
offender. It also pointed out that the cost of educating offenders
is marginal as compared to the costs incurred by lengthy or
repetitive incarceration. As such, policymakers should formulate and
support programs aimed at educating prisoners, especially juvenile
delinquents.
Full Text: COPYRIGHT 1998 Council
of State Governments
Center on Crime, Communities and Culture
A
report issued from the Center on Crime, Communities and Culture says
education is the, key to keeping offenders from returning to jail ‑
and it is very inexpensive compared to lengthy incarceration. As
former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger said, "We must
accept the reality that to confine offenders behind walls without
trying to change them is an expensive folly with short‑term
benefits."
According
to Education as Crime Prevention: Providing Education to Prisoners,
"reported rates of recidivism for adult offenders in the United
States are extraordinarily high, ranging from 41 percent to 60
percent." The report notes that "according to the Federal Bureau of
Prisons, there is an inverse relationship between recidivism rates
and education. The more education received, the less likely an
individual is to be re‑arrested or reimprisoned" In some cases noted
in the report, the rates of recidivism were dramatically lowered
'"Research studies conducted in Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts,
New York and other states have all reported significantly low
recidivism rates for inmate participants in correctional
higher‑education programs, ranging from 1 percent to 15.5 percent.
The
report notes that in New York, it costs $25,000 to incarcerate a
prisoner for one year; educating a prisoner for a year costs only
$2,500. Educating inmates, while adding only 10 percent to the
costs, could save the state millions of dollars in the future by
preventing recidivism.
"If
we consider the additional benefit of this individual obtaining
work, paying taxes, and contributing to the general economy, and the
prevention of costs to victims of crime and the criminal justice
system, the benefits are significantly greater;" the report says.
The
report recommends ensuring quality education for juveniles involved
in the criminal justice system. The earlier the intervention, the
report notes, the greater positive impact on the innate. The report
also urges greater financial support for correctional education
programs. "The reinstatement of federal financial assistance in the
fort of Pell Grants to inmates is crucial," the study says.
The study also advocates greater emphasis art post‑release
supportive services. "Many individuals may find themselves released
without access to employment opportunities and/or additional
training and education programs." The report concludes by stating,
"If we are serious about preventing and reducing crime, it is
critical to adopt the most effective, humane and cost‑efficient
means of doing so."